Nativeness and Intelligibility: Investigating Kurdish EFL Teachers’ Orientations

Dr.Dlakhshan Y. Othman, Dr. Qismat Mohammad Zahawi

Salahaddin University/College of Basic Education       Salahaddin University/College of Basic Education

dlakhshan.othman@su.edu.krd                                        qismat.hussin@su.edu.krd

 DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.31972/iscs20.009

Abstract

This study aims to investigate Kurdish EFL teachers’ orientations toward nativeness and intelligibility principles in their pronunciation and how they view their own accent. Data will be gathered from questionnaire respondents from English Department/College of Basic Education at Salahaddin University. In addition, the research tries to draw the distinction in orientations between teachers who have studied MA abroad and those who have been awarded their MA/ PhD by universities in Kurdistan Region (KR)- Iraq. This would show the potential influence of being exposed to the foreign language and culture on teachers’ orientations toward nativeness and intelligibility principles. The data were analysed statistically by using SPSS. The main conclusions of the study were that the majority of Kurdish EFL teachers were in favour of nativeness principle in their pronunciation. Moreover, a higher rate of the teachers who studied abroad were nativeness oriented in their pronunciation as compared to the teachers who have pursued their higher study in KR- Iraq.

Key Words: Nativeness, Intelligibility, Accent, Identity

Research Link

References

  • Becker, P. (1995). The etiology of foreign accent: Towards a phonological component of identity. A published master’s thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
  • Bøhn, H. and Hansen, T. (2017). Assessing Pronunciation in an EFL Context: Teachers’ Orientations towards Nativeness and Intelligibility. Language Assessment Quarterly.14(1), pp.54-68.
  • Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., Goodwin, J. M. & Griner, B, A. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A Course Book and Reference Guide (2nd  ). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Çetkin, S. (2016). Search of Zazaki Speaking Individuals For Identity Zazaca. Bingöl Üniversitesi Yaşayan Diller Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2 (2), pp. 46-58.
  • Cook, V. (2012). Nativeness and Language Pedagogy. In The Encyclopedia of Applied

Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0857/abstract.

  • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (3), pp. 1–16.
  • Edwards, J. (1999). Refining our understanding of language attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 18 (2), pp. 101-110.
  • Flege, J., Bohn,O., and Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on non-native subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics. 25 (4), pp. 437–470.
  • Gallois, C., Ogay, T., and Giles, H. (2005). “Communication Accommodation Theory: A look Back and a Look Ahead”. In Gudykunst, William B. (ed.). Theorizing About Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 121–148.
  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: OUP.
  • Keeley, T. D. (2016). “Is a native-like accent in a foreign language achievable? Examining neurological, sociological, psychological,and attitudinal factors”. Journal of Kyushu Sangyo University.26 (4), pp. 59-92.
  • Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English Pronunciation. London: Longman.
  • Khatib, M. and Monfared, A. (2017). Exploring Teachers’ Attitudes towards Pronunciation Issues and Varieties of English in Three Circles of World Englishes. Applied Research on English Language. 6.( 2), pp. 213-236.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, England: Pergamon Institute.
  • Levis, J. (2007). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39 (3), pp., 369–377.
  • Miller, J. (2004). Identity and language use: The politics of speaking ESL in schools. In A. Pavlenko and A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 290-315). Great Britain: Cromwell Press.
  • Munro, M. J. and Derwing, T. M.. 1995. ‘Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech’. Language and Speech. 38 (3), pp. 289–306.
  • I. S. P. and Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and Speaking. NewYork: Routledge.
  • Park, S. M. (2013). Non-native English Speaking Teachers in the Field of English Language Teaching: A Korean EFL teacher’s Perspective. Humanising Language Teaching. 15 (4), pp. 4-12.
  • Pullen, E. (2011). The Relationship between Cultural Identity and Pronunciation of Non-native Speakers of English in an EFL Setting. An Unpublished MA thesis, Bilkent University.
  • Richards, J. C. and Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 3rd edition. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Rivers, W. M. (1968). Teaching Foreign Language Skills (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Sheyholislami, J. (2011). Kurdish Identity. In: Kurdish Identity, Discourse, and New Media. The Palgrave Macmillan Series in International Political Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • Shively, R. L. (2008). L2 acquisition of [β], [δ], and [γ] in Spanish: Impact of experience, linguistic environment and learner variables. Southwest Journal of Linguistics. 27 (2), 79-114.
  • Sifakis, N. C. (2004). Teaching EIL – teaching international or intercultural English: What teachers should know? 32 (2), pp. 237–50.
  • Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *